Standard
of Value is Everything!
Standard
of Value Represents the Key Assumption of the Appraisal
The Standard of Value (archaically called the Definition of
Value) assumed by the appraiser is the fundamental assumption
under which the valuation proceeds. It represents the most
basic instruction from the client to the appraiser, and tailors
the valuation analysis to the requirements of the users of
the appraisal. There are several typical standards of value
commonly used by business appraisers: Fair Market Value, Fair
Value, Investment Value, and a few specialized standards of
value.
Fair Market Value. This is the typical “willing
buyer-willing seller” kind of value, expressed as cash
or cash equivalent. It assumes that both the buyer and seller
are knowledgeable and are in possession of all pertinent facts,
are risk averse and possess competency in the operation of
the business. This value represents a composite of all financial
buyers, but excludes strategic buyers (buyers who will obtain
synergy value by buying the subject property). This standard
of value is typical in most kinds of litigation, and illustrates
the price at which the business would transact in an open
market.
Fair Value. There are many notions of Fair
Value, but the most common standard is the same as Fair Market
Value but the subject interest is valued as though it were
a controlling interest, i.e. without taking a minority discount.
This assumption is usually present in statutory appraisals
pursuant to shareholder oppression litigation. (i.e. Corp
Code §2000.
Investment Value. Investment Value is nothing
more than the value of the subject interest to a particular
named person or entity, and usually includes the value of
the business the buyer will obtain through synergies with
his own existing business entities.
Variations on the Theme. There are many variations
on the theme, of course. One such variation is the legal requirement
that the appraiser not give effect to a buy/sell or partnership
agreement where the agreement is construed by law to unfairly
penalize the non-owner spouse in the division of community
property. Partners might, for example, draft a partnership
agreement that makes the partnership interest valueless for
purposes of distribution of community property, but the law
in that jurisdiction might require that the appraiser to not
give voice to that provision and appraise the partnership
interest as though the agreement did not exist. |