Marketability
Misconceptions
Marketability = Liquidity.
The notion of a discount to value based on the marketability
of the subject property has been around for a long time, and
is based in fundamental proposition that the market craves
liquidity and loathes the absence of it. All else equal, a
liquid (marketable, as if freely traded) investment should
be worth more than an illiquid (less marketable, not freely
traded) one. Actual performance of the market clearly demonstrates
this phenomenon.
Marketability = Risk. The concept of a marketability
discount seems to suggest the value of the subject business
should be less because no one would want to buy it. The managing
spouse often protests that the business should have a marketability
discount because it’s not making money. But technically,
this is incorrect: the desirability of the subject business
as an investment should be addressed in the required rate
of return (i.e. the capitalization rate or the discount rate).
Less desirable businesses are riskier investments, so investors
would require a higher rate of return on the expected income
stream, irrespective of the size or velocity of the marketplace.
Discount Always Relative. For the business appraiser,
marketability discounts, (more properly, adjustments for lack
of liquidity or for difference of marketability) are critical
to the accuracy of the valuation result. But the key thing
to remember is that the marketability discounts are always
relative to some reference point of value. For example, if
the appraiser relies on transactions of public stock (a common
benchmark for liquidity) as a source for the development of
the discount rate, then the resulting value of the subject
business is its value as if were as liquid as publicly traded
stocks (which it is not). Without an adjustment to match the
marketability (liquidity) of the subject business to the publicly
traded stocks that were used as the basis for the discount
rate, the value of the subject business may be significantly
over-stated.
Marketability Discount is Internal. In this
sense, the marketability discount may be said to be internal
to the methodology selected by the appraiser, and not closely
related to the characteristics of the subject business except
insofar as it is less liquid (i.e. would take longer to convert
to cash than publicly traded stocks). In the conventional
sense, the marketability adjustment only arises because the
appraiser uses the rate of return obtained by investors in
publicly traded stocks as the source for the benchmark rate
of return in his discount-rate development. Were he to use
a rate of return obtained by investors in privately-held entities
- for example buyers/holders of shares in private corporations
- as the benchmark rate of return, no such marketability adjustment
would be required because the liquidity of the source for
the benchmark rate is the same as the liquidity of the subject
ownership interest. This is a watershed change in thinking
(though not a new concept by any means) for many lay-thinkers.
Measuring the Discount. Once the decision
has been made to rely on trades of publicly traded stocks
as the source for the benchmark rate of return, the appraiser
must next take steps to measure the extent of discount from
the “as if freely traded” value that results form
the application of the benchmark-based discount rate. There
are a couple of good ways to measure the size of the discount
to apply, and we’ll address these in a future issue.
|