Forensic
Accounting in Divorce Matters
Divorce is unique in that the motivations to be less than
honest are often more complicated than the typical financial
crime motivated purely by financial gain. In a divorce, a
spouse may have the desire to “cheat” his or her
spouse out of their “fair share” of the marital
property or humiliate, emotionally overwhelm or otherwise
damage their spouse.
The most common cheating by divorcing spouses is to understate
assets and income in a closely held business. An owner has
the ability to manipulate situations in ways limited only
by their imagination. However, there are recurring patterns
of activity in the understatement of income and assets. They
involve personal use of business assets (automobile, club
dues, payment of personal living expenses by the business,
petty cash abuse, inventory abuse) self-dealing with related
parties (relatives of business partners), sudden decrease
in revenues, revenue deferment, new or hidden bank accounts,
unnecessary bad debt reserves or write-offs and unreported
cash transactions.
In order to successfully uncover the actions of a dishonest
spouse requires a level of tenacity and “thick skin”,
not only by the forensic accountant, but also by the entire
litigation team.
When a divorce requires a business valuation it is a good
idea to engage a practitioner who is not only skilled in business
valuation, but forensic accounting as well. The hiding of
income and assets not only impacts the amount of alimony and
child support ultimately paid to the “out spouse”
but may also have a material impact on the value of the business.
Though such engagements are distinct and separate an expert
with experience in both business valuation and forensic accounting
is the most cost effective method of dealing with a business
valuation and related fraudulent activity.
In the normal course of the preparation of a business valuation
ABA has uncovered numerous instances of cheating schemes,
even when the “out spouse” had no idea “something
was wrong”. A business valuation professional without
forensic expertise might not have discovered the systematic
looting of the company by the “in spouse.
|